<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>oxygen's internet blog - Latest Comments in Twitter 宕机超过一小时</title><link>http://ecvip.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ecvip.disqus.com/twitter_29/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:14:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter 宕机超过一小时</title><link>http://ecvip.org/archives/765#comment-8803119</link><description>&lt;p&gt;得一位高人说。。。好帖子与垃圾帖的区别在于。。。好帖子越看越暖。。。而垃圾帖。。。越看越寒。。。我呢。。。一开始就和普通人一样。。。不相信真&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">中国绿软基地</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:14:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter 宕机超过一小时</title><link>http://ecvip.org/archives/765#comment-8803118</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter 之所以受到用户和投资者的青睐，很大程度上是因为它足够简单，以及由它衍生出来的众多第三方应用，这些让 Twitter 足够强大。&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;而国内的模仿品们，包括饭否，似乎还停留在“工具”的阶段，还不足以成长为一个“平台”，加上经济形势不好，所以个人觉得，饭否的机会仍然很小。&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">oxygen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:55:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter 宕机超过一小时</title><link>http://ecvip.org/archives/765#comment-8803117</link><description>&lt;p&gt;说Twitter最火爆的web2.0网站过了，还不能和Facebook相比&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">蓝天博客</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:49:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter 宕机超过一小时</title><link>http://ecvip.org/archives/765#comment-8803116</link><description>&lt;p&gt;打开那站很慢我这里~~&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">恒工</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:51:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter 宕机超过一小时</title><link>http://ecvip.org/archives/765#comment-8803115</link><description>&lt;p&gt;今天twitter拿到投资了，国内的饭否 &lt;a href="http://www.fanfou.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.fanfou.com"&gt;http://www.fanfou.com&lt;/a&gt; 是不是开始有机会了？感觉饭否在国内做得不错，功能也很强大&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">小白</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:11:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter 宕机超过一小时</title><link>http://ecvip.org/archives/765#comment-8803114</link><description>&lt;p&gt;欢迎回来，链接已加 :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">oxygen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:06:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter 宕机超过一小时</title><link>http://ecvip.org/archives/765#comment-8803113</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi，我回来了。&lt;br&gt;有空能否把我的链接放回首页？thx&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">散人</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:53:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter 宕机超过一小时</title><link>http://ecvip.org/archives/765#comment-8803112</link><description>&lt;p&gt;确实很可爱~~ 呵呵·&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xiaonei</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:27:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter 宕机超过一小时</title><link>http://ecvip.org/archives/765#comment-8803111</link><description>&lt;p&gt;图片的确不一样，可能是随机显示的&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">oxygen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:14:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter 宕机超过一小时</title><link>http://ecvip.org/archives/765#comment-8803110</link><description>&lt;p&gt;是啊 是啊 &lt;br&gt;我刷新了N遍，说是半小时。。&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sophie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:48:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter 宕机超过一小时</title><link>http://ecvip.org/archives/765#comment-8803109</link><description>&lt;p&gt;我这好像没有那么长时间。&lt;br&gt;PS:宕机时的图片还是不一样的啊。&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leplay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:42:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>